Dear Meriem Djefel, As Kish said, you better use « fail » to have all solutions, rather than the « all solutin » trick (like bagof/setof/..). Actually, bagof DO things by placing a « fail » in order to force the « retry » . Bagof/findall/setof then store each solution (by inserting fancy clauses). Taking a look at the bagof code may tell you much more (a simple version) : % want a list of all of the solutions to « Goal » formatted by « Termes » bagof(Termes, Goal, List_of_Termes) :- call(Goal), put_the_solution_into_the_knowledge_base(Goal), %e.g. by assert. fail. bagof(_, _, List_of_Termes) :- gather_solutions_into_a_list(Goal , List_of_Termes). %if any. Be careful, upon the one (bagof/findall/..) you may use, some fail if there is NO solution, some succeed anyway and return an empty list when there’s no Solution to « Goal » . Alex Le 4 mars 2010 à 22:12, Kish Shen a écrit : > Meriem Djefel wrote: >> Deal all, >> I have two questions : >> 1. I want to how we can have all the solution of a problem in > eclipse without use the command *more *to have the next solution. > > As Christian says, if you want to collect all the solutions, you can use > findall and friends. Note that these copy each solution. > > If all you want is to print all the solutions, you can print a solution, > and call fail to force backtracking to get the next solution; this is > essentially what 'more' does.. > >> 2. I have also an error in my code when I write : VitesseMaxi > $::[400,450] in the following constraint : >> ( >> (VitesseMaxi $= 600 , DistanceVol #::[800, 1000], > ReservoirSupp #= 300); >> (VitesseMaxi $::[400,450] , DistanceVol #= 1600, > ReservoirSupp #= 300); >> (VitesseMaxi $::[400,450] , DistanceVol #= 1400, > ReservoirSupp #= 200); >> (VitesseMaxi $= 550 , DistanceVol #:: [800,1000], > ReservoirSupp #= 200); >> (VitesseMaxi $= [450,400] , DistanceVol #= 1200, > ReservoirSupp #= 100); >> (VitesseMaxi $= 500 , DistanceVol #:: [800,1000], > ReservoirSupp #= 100) >> ); > > You didn't say which solver you are using, but you seem to be using ic. > The '$' variant of constraints (like $::) are for reals, and as the > manual says, for reals, you have a real interval, i.e. a single > contineous interval, and you cannot set individual values like 400, 450 > to such an interval (you can do that in a finite domain, where the > domain consists of integer values, rather than a contineous interval). > Why are you using the $ variant of constraints for VitesseMaxi, when you > actually assigning integer values to it? > > Cheers, > > Kish > > > -- > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the > sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or > disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact > the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. > Cisco Systems Limited (Company Number: 02558939), is registered in > England and Wales with its registered office at 1 Callaghan Square, > Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF10 5BT. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > ECLiPSe-CLP-Users mailing list > ECLiPSe-CLP-Users_at_lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipse-clp-users ------------------------------- Alexandre Saidi Maitre de Conférences Ecole Centrale de Lyon-Dép. MI LIRIS-CNRS UMR 5205 Tél : 0472186530, Fax : 0472186443Received on Fri Mar 05 2010 - 08:49:52 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 02:31:58 CET