Hi, I wrote a blog post about solving PuzzlOR "Electrifying" puzzle with ECLiPSe: http://sdymchenko.com/blog/2015/03/13/electrifying-eclipse/ While solving the puzzle I encountered and issue with bb_min and strategies other than the default one. Consider this program (basically the same program as in the blog post linked): :- lib(ic). :- lib(branch_and_bound). solve(HouseXs, HouseYs, K, GenXs, GenYs, Cost) :- dim(HouseXs, [N]), MaxX #= max(HouseXs), MaxY #= max(HouseYs), dim(GenXs, [K]), dim(GenYs, [K]), GenXs :: 1..MaxX, GenYs :: 1..MaxY, ( for(I, 1, N), foreach(Di, Distances), param(HouseXs, HouseYs, GenXs, GenYs, K) do ( for(J, 1, K), fromto(1.0Inf, Dprev, Dcurr, Di), param(I, HouseXs, HouseYs, GenXs, GenYs) do Dcurr $= min(Dprev, sqrt(sqr(HouseXs[I] - GenXs[J]) + sqr(HouseYs[I] - GenYs[J]))) ) ), Cost $= sum(Distances), bb_min(search([](GenXs, GenYs), 0, most_constrained, indomain_middle, complete, []), Cost, bb_options{delta:0.1, strategy:dichotomic}). main :- HouseXs = [](2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10), HouseYs = [](2, 5, 6, 8, 2, 10, 2, 3, 6, 8, 1, 5, 2, 8, 5, 7, 8, 4, 7, 3), solve(HouseXs, HouseYs, 3, GenXs, GenYs, _Cost), ( foreacharg(X, GenXs), foreacharg(Y, GenYs) do LetterCode is 0'A + Y - 1, char_code(Letter, LetterCode), write(X), write(Letter), nl ). With strategy:dichotomic I get: Found a solution with cost 67.5083636407248__67.50836364072498 Found no solution with cost 0.0 .. 33.75418182036249 instantiation fault in 33.75418182036249 =< _325826{49.307233137943534 .. 49.30723313794369} abort There is a similar issue with strategy:restart, but the program works OK with the default continue strategy. Is this an ECLiPSe bug? -Sergii.Received on Fri Mar 13 2015 - 19:39:14 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 14 2015 - 00:13:12 CET