On 12/12/14 03:51, Edgaonkar, Shrirang wrote: > Dear Joachim, > > It would be great if the problem would be fixed. I read your email and > understood. The large domain is due to the LONG range used in java as I am > mapping it with variables in java. In few cases, I could be in a situation > where the no of constraints are very less. The above bug fix will also help > me in my approach for real numbers. Please see below. As I mentioned in my earlier reply, you should simply use indomain_split, which will give you the expected answer: ?- X :: -9223372036854775808 .. 9223372036854775807, X $> 115000000000, search([X], 0, input_order, indomain_split, complete, []). X = 115000000001 Yes (0.00s cpu, solution 1, maybe more) > > On a separate note, please look at the following example. I read your posts > on real numbers and understand the limitation to solve equations if the a > finite solution is non existant. > > To counter the same, I have come up with the following solution. ... > > Please let me know your thoughts on this. It's difficult to make a recommendation without knowing what kind of problem you are actually trying to solve. -- JoachimReceived on Fri Dec 12 2014 - 15:02:23 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 15 2014 - 03:13:30 CET