I ran this example. The results were unexpected. ----- eplex_9.ecl % Run in this way: mip_example(X,Y,Cost). % From http://eclipseclp.org/doc/libman/libman060.html#toc67 entitled 10.2.6 Examples /* Results: ?- mip_example(X, Y, Cost). X = X{-1.7976931348623157e+308 .. 1.7976931348623157e+308 @ 2.0} Y = Y{-1.7976931348623157e+308 .. 1.7976931348623157e+308 @ 2.0} Cost = 2.0 Yes (0.00s cpu) No integer variables - nothing to do (in orange letters) */ :- lib(eplex). :- eplex_instance(my_instance). mip_example(X,Y,Cost) :- my_instance: (X+Y $>= 3), my_instance: (X-Y $= 0), my_instance: integers([X]), % This is a mixed integer problem. my_instance: eplex_solver_setup(min(X)), my_instance: eplex_solve(Cost). ----- However, I was able to run a similar example without any warnings and the result showed as an integer, rather than a decimal. ----- eplex_3.ecl % Run in this way: top(X,Y,Cost). % >From http://eclipseclp.org/reports/Workshop/eplex.ppt entitled The EPLEX Library /* Results: ?- top(X, Y, Cost). X = 2 <<<<<<====== X is printed as an integer, 2, not a decimal, 2.0. (Nicely done.) Y = 2.0 Cost = 2.0 Yes (0.00s cpu) */ :-lib(eplex). top(X,Y,Cost) :- X+Y $>=3, X-Y $= 0, integers([X]), % This is a mixed integer problem. optimize(min(X),Cost). ----- Is the result in my first program run (i.e., eplex_9.ecl, at the top of this email) the correct behavior or did I do something wrong?Received on Thu Oct 10 2013 - 15:05:02 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 11 2013 - 06:13:24 CEST