Thanks everyone. On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Kish Shen <kisshen_at_cisco.com> wrote: > On 16/08/2013 01:47, Volkan Unsal wrote: > >> Being new to Eclipse, I am trying to understand some basic concepts. I >> don't understand why are some Eclipse predicates not available from inside >> loops. For example: >> >> # test.ecl >> main :- >> (foreach(A,[1,2]) do >> Z is string(A), >> writeln( Z ) >> ). >> >> > If you have Z is string(A) outside a loop, you would get the same error. > > The problem you are seeing is because is/2 expects an arithmetic > expression on the right-hand side, and if you look at the documentation for > is/2 (which you can get by "help is/2" at the top-level): > > > This evaluation mechanism outlined above is not restricted to the > > predefined arithmetic functors shown in the table. In fact it works > for > > all atoms and compound terms. It is therefore possible to define a new > > arithmetic operation by just defining an evaluation predicate. > > Similarly, many ECLiPSe built-ins return numbers in the last argument > > and can thus be used as evaluation predicates (e.g.cputime/1, random/1, > > string_length/2, ...). Note that recursive evaluation of arguments is > > only done for the predefined arithmetic functions, for the others the > > arguments are simply passed to the evaluation predicate. > > So string(A) is treated as a call to a predicate string/2, which is not > defined, as reported by the error message you saw: > > > $ eclipse -b test.ecl -e main >> calling an undefined procedure string(1, _105343) in module eclipse >> abort >> >> > > These are available from the command line when I query the data, but not >> from within the program. How do I do type checking on the variables if I >> can't use these...? >> > > is/2 is intended (as in other Prologs) for evaluating an arithmetic > expression. If you want to do type checking, you should not put the type > check predicate on the rhs of is/2. You should just call it, e.g. > > (foreach(A, As) do string(A)) > > > Almost exactly the same problem with comparison operators: >> >> fn1 :- >> (foreach(A,[1,2]) do >> Z is compare("<", A, 1), >> writeln( Z ) >> ). >> %% calling an undefined procedure compare("<", 1, 1, _103944) in module >> eclipse >> %% abort >> >> > Again, you should just have compare("<", A, 1) on its own, although here > you can write: > > 1 is compare("<", A) > > because the last argument does return a number. > > Cheers, > > Kish > >Received on Fri Aug 16 2013 - 18:54:59 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 17 2013 - 06:13:32 CEST