Ulrich Scholz wrote: > Dear all, > > sometimes, the compiler leaves spurious choice points, i.e., choice points > that are later discovered to be not there. I thought (or hoped) that these > "false" choice points would be eliminated by optimization via type testing. > > Is there any way to prevent this? It is somewhat distracting during tracing > and bug fixing. > > Best regards, > > Ulrich > > > > An example: > > --- ttt.ecl --- > t2(T1, _T2) :- > free(T1), > !, > writeln(a). > > t2(_T1, T2) :- > T2 \== [], > writeln(b). > > t2(_T1, []) :- > writeln(c). > ---------------- I would write such an example with a conditional t2(T1, T2) :- ( free(T1) -> writeln(a) ; T2 == [] -> writeln(c) ; writeln(b) ). An unrelated point: please don't get into the habit of using free/1 instead of var/1 --- read the explanation at http://eclipseclp.org/doc/bips/kernel/typetest/free-1.html -- JoachimReceived on Thu Jan 20 2011 - 23:52:00 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 02:31:58 CET