Problem fix! I would like to ask you if using suspend is the best way to compute the D_El variables? There is a faster way ?! Best regards, Bogdan. From: Bogdan Tanasa [mailto:g-bogta_at_ida.liu.se] Sent: 8 octombrie 2010 22:53 To: 'eclipse-clp-users_at_lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: FW: code problem Now it seems to work a little bit better but I have problem with the gcd /3 predicate. According to the manual: In coroutining mode, if Number1 or Number2 are uninstantiated, the call is delayed until these variables are instantiated. .. I still get the instantiation fault error. How can I switch to coroutining mode and what that means ? Best regards, Bogdan. From: Bogdan Tanasa [mailto:g-bogta_at_ida.liu.se] Sent: 8 octombrie 2010 18:08 To: 'eclipse-clp-users_at_lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: FW: code problem I come back with my problemJ. I was able to find an workaround to obtain what I want. I am running the bb_min to get the optimal solution but when asking the solver for other solutions (MORE) I get solutions which a lower cost the the initial one. For me it seems that bb_min is not actually computing the optimal solution. What can be the problem? Best regards, Bogdan. From: Bogdan Tanasa [mailto:g-bogta_at_ida.liu.se] Sent: 8 octombrie 2010 14:20 To: 'eclipse-clp-users_at_lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: code problem Hi guys, I am trying to solve a problem and I have written the constraints but I observe a strange behavior. I have some Boolean variables and I compute some periods like this: T / x where x is the Boolean variable. I am doing this because I want to get the minimum period for only those variables which are equal with 1. So in the case when all are 0 I am expecting to get +1.0Inf as the minimum value. When I print the constraints I get an interval instead of one value. What can be the cause? Best regards, Bogdan.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 02:31:58 CET