Marco Gavanelli wrote: > Amine Marref wrote: >> I have substituted ";" with "or" and it works. I thought that they are equivalent like "," and "and" are equivalent (I hope they are). > > they are logically equivalent, but they have a different operational > semantics (they do different things). > To expand on what Marco says, and/2, or/2 are "reified connectives". The constraints occurring within them are reified. Simply put, this means they are passive, that is, reified constraints are only passively checked to see if they are entailed or dis-entailed or not. On the other hand, when you post Cons1, Cons2, this posts both constraints, and their consequences are actively propagated. You can see the difference with the simple example of two mutually inconsistent constraints: X #> Y Y #> X this should fail. If you post these as constraints (and with a finite domain for X and Y), the inconsistency will (eventually) be detected: X,Y :: [1..1000], X #> Y, Y #> X. will eventually fail. [An aside: this is of course the rather well know illustration of a weakness of local constraint propagation -- as discussed recently in other threads in this mailing list.] On the other hand, for the reified version: X,Y :: [1..1000], (X #> Y and Y #> X). does not fail, as the consequences of the two constraints are not propagated, and the check are performed on the two constraint individually -- i.e. X #> Y and X #> X are checked on their own, and nothing can be concluded with either constraint on their own. [For anything to happen, X and Y need to have domains where the constraints can be shown to be either true or false, e.g. X ::[1..50] Y ::[51..100]. Amine Marref wrote: > I always wondered what when to use ";", when to use "or", and when to >use multiple definitions of a predicate e.g. "con(X):-X#>0. \n >con(X):-X#<0." If you want to learn more about Constraint (Logic) Programming, using the mailing list is probably not the best way. You may want to read some of the textbooks on Constraint Programming, e.g. the ones mentioned in the Literature section of the eclipse-clp.org website. Cheers, Kish -- This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. Cisco Systems Limited (Company Number: 02558939), is registered in England and Wales with its registered office at 1 Callaghan Square, Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF10 5BT.Received on Thu Feb 18 2010 - 16:05:20 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 02:31:58 CET