Dear All, I have a constraint with exponentiation as follows: :- lib(ic). dv(Fs):- Fs::[18000,20000,22000,24000], Fmax is 24000, Fmin is 18000, Lamda0 is 1e-6, D is 4, Si is 1, Lamda = Lamda0*10^(D*(Fmax-Fs)/(Fmax-Fmin)), Rfmax = exp(-Lamda*1000000/Fmax/1e5), Q = (1-Rfmax)^(Si-1), eval(Q) $>= -1000. Since Rfmax is close to 1 (0.99..) and Si is 1, Q will be 1. So the constraint is actually redundent and does not have any effect on Fs. However, I get a No as a result. Anything wrong? My second question is aobut eval/1. By using $>=/2, the goals are suspended before all variables are instantiated. Then why do I have to use eval? I get errors without it. If I don't use Q to pass the expresson and use eval((1-Rfmax)^(Si-1)) $>= -1000, I get the same error as I use Q and do not use eval. The error is "some constants are expected". Any suggestion is appriciated. Best, Liu,Yu 2009-09-15 liu.yu.senior.chinaReceived on Tue Sep 15 2009 - 21:49:00 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 02:31:58 CET