Marcin Krol wrote: > ..and I was under impression that I could use any predicate as bb_min's > Goal? How do I tell which predicate generates a search tree and which > does not? > What bb_min/3 actually requires is that you bind Cost within Goal, and the search returns the best (minimal) value of Cost. sum(X,S) will only instantiate S (your cost variable) if X is a ground list of numbers, which it isn't in your program, as you don't have anything that will instantiate the variables in X. If you call bb_min with X as a ground list of numbers, then bb_min/3 will succeed, but it is not very interesting, as there is no real search at all (sum/2 returns only a single answer). What you need for a real search are goals which will produce choices (if you are unfamiliar with this, you should probably read any Prolog textbook), like labeling/1 (there is (normally) more than one way to label your variables) and member/2 (if you have more than one element in your list, then there is more than one member). Cheers, Kish -- This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. Cisco Systems Limited (Company Number: 02558939), is registered in England and Wales with its registered office at 1 Callaghan Square, Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF10 5BT.Received on Mon Feb 16 2009 - 17:54:51 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 02:31:58 CET