Re: Suggestion: #::(V, [], 0) should succeed

From: <wh_at_icparc.ic.ac.uk>
Date: Wed 03 Aug 2005 12:26:07 PM GMT
Message-ID: <20050803122607.GN24368@tempest.icparc.ic.ac.uk>
This has been fixed in the latest development version now available for
download (5.9#25).

Cheers,
Warwick

On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:08:49PM +0200, wh@icparc.ic.ac.uk wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this.  I've filed it as bug 490 in our bug tracking
> system (http://eclipse.icparc.ic.ac.uk/eclipseBugs/).
> 
> Cheers,
> Warwick
> 
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 04:29:18PM +0200, Ulrich Scholz wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > #::/3 should silently accept an empty domain.  
> > 
> > Right now, ::(X, [], 0) aborts with the message 
> > undefined arithmetic expression in _210 is [] in module eclipse
> > 
> > ::(X, [-inf..inf], 1) succeds, therefore its inverse ::(X, [], 0) should 
> > succeed, too.
> > 
> > Uli
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ulrich Scholz            
> > 
> > Personal Memory Group                   
> > European Media Laboratory GmbH
> > 
> 
Received on Wed Aug 03 13:33:49 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 16 Nov 2005 06:07:38 PM GMT GMT