Hi, I am using eclipse 7.0 #42 for linux 64 bits, and after loading (in the interpreter) the IC library the answer to the following query appears "erroneous" to me. [eclipse 2]: [E1,E2,N1] $:: -1..1, X $= 4 + E1 + E2 + N1, X $= -E1 + 3*E2. E1 = E1{-1.0 .. 0.5000000116152874} E2 = E2{0.49999998838471316 .. 1.0} N1 = N1{-1.0 .. 0.5000000116152874} X = X{2.4999999651541396 .. 4.0} Delayed goals:... It appears to me that the interval for E1 should be -1..-0.5 and that of N1 should be -1..0. We can, roughly, see that this is the case for E1 when we 'narrow' the domain of E1 as follows. [eclipse 3]: E1 $:: -0.4..0.5, [E2,N1] $:: -1..1, X $= 4 + E1 + E2 + N1, X $= -E1 + 3*E2. No (0.00s cpu) What am I missing in the reading of the displayed intervals? Is there an heuristic/method to lead the constraint solver to a tighter answer, in my example? Kind regards, JulioReceived on Tue May 22 2018 - 11:38:42 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Sep 25 2024 - 15:13:21 CEST