I' just start the email over sorry so sorry (i had to clear up between my_string_words and pretend_value .. and they were meant to be the same attribute) Hi I would like believe that I can use attvars/metaterms to proxy for complex datatypes. Lets pretend I created a fake string datatype that holds sentences using entire words like [hello,world] .. I'll print this as "hello world" Let add that this datatype can also hold unbound word element to like [hello,_]. I'll store these physically in an attribute called my_string_words so far so good? V1 = my_string_words([hello,beautiful,world]) + had an attribute foo (inst1) V2 = another my_string_words([hello,_]) + had an attribute foo(inst2)) It would possible (if i so wanted) To unify V1=V2 I get a wakeup to decide the my_string_words were a okay to unify And have the outcome be be that if i checked the values.. I will been allowed to modify my my_string_words of V2 to now be [hello,world] ? I am guessing the answer is still yes Here is the question: Could V1 and V2 still be different variables? could possibly still find different 'foo' attributes V1 and V2 respectively? Thank you in advance, DouglasReceived on Mon Jan 02 2017 - 09:05:30 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Sep 25 2024 - 15:13:21 CEST