Re: [eclipse-users] bb_min problem

From: Kish Shen <kisshen_at_...5...>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:07:20 +0100
Hi Jakub,

Jakub Wojt wrote:
>> Hi Jakub,
>> The code you sent seems to be missing computeQuality/3 -- I assume >your code actually spend most of its time there.
> sorry,
> computeQuality is an external C function, code is in file attached to email. I compiled it under gcc 3.4.2.(Dev-Cpp package).
> I don't belive that computeQuality is very time-consuming, in fact i can set it's execute time to ~0.
The timeout only works while executing ECLiPSe code, not external C 
code. However, if you say that your C function finished quickly, I 
assume it instantiates Result, the cost variable? You should get a first 
solution very quickly, and then backtracking starts. It seems that the 
labeling is able to produce solutions very quickly, and then the code 
should execute computeQuality again -- could these subsequent calls to 
it take a long time?


Received on Fri Aug 03 2007 - 00:07:32 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Jul 21 2019 - 12:15:27 CEST