On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:02:10PM +1000, Malcolm Ryan wrote: > Yes, but I want the constraints to be passed around as data before > being applied. I'm working towards adding a feature to the > "generic_sets" library so that you can specify a bunch of constraints > that are applied to every element of the set. Yes, I often thought I need something like this. And I understand what you mean with > the handling of unbound variables is always awkward, I would like to use constraint programming for problems where a solution is not a particular assignment to the variables but the final set of constraints on the (possibly unassigned) variables. Traditionally, you simply post constraints and then they are "lost" in the system - no way to get them out again (not speaking of the processed, optimized set of constraints after, e.g., propagation). My solution here is to keep track of the posted constraints externally. When the algorithm finds a solution (again, not necessarily a full assignment but a constraint satisfaction problem for which there are valid assignments) then the stored constraint set is manually post-processed and returned. Double work. Please tell me about your progress. I did my own homebrewn solutions and sometimes had to resort to dirty tricks. Keep on posting your questions. Good luck! Ulrich -- Ulrich Scholz Phone: +49-6221-533244 Email: ulrich.scholz_at_...10... European Media Laboratory GmbH Schloss-Wolfsbrunnenweg 33 69118 Heidelberg Amtsgericht Mannheim / HRB 335719 Managing Partner: Dr. h.c. Klaus Tschira, Scientific and Managing Director: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Andreas Reuter www.eml-d.villa-bosch.deReceived on Thu Mar 29 2007 - 09:55:00 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Sep 25 2024 - 15:13:20 CEST