Hi everybody, a question about setof/3: The manual states that the result is sorted but I could not find according to which ordering. I guess, it's the standart term order. How could an implementation of setof/3 look like that uses an arbitrary, i.e., user-supplied ordering? Thank you, Ulrich BTW, the manual states "This predicate is sensitive to its module context (tool predicate, see _at_/1)". I guess, that sould read "... see @/2)". -- Ulrich Scholz Personal Memory Group European Media Laboratory GmbHReceived on Thu Oct 26 2006 - 17:32:39 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Sep 25 2024 - 15:13:20 CEST